RTI Transparency Issues in India: How Bureaucratic Delays and Legal Loopholes Threaten the Right to Know

🏛️ Introduction: The Transparency Law Under Pressure

When India enacted the Right to Information (RTI) Act in 2005, it was hailed as one of the most progressive transparency laws in the world. It empowered citizens to seek information from public authorities, demand accountability, and expose corruption at every level of governance.

However, 20 years later, the promise of transparency appears to be fading. Increasing delays in response, unfilled vacancies in information commissions, restrictive data protection laws, and political influence are creating serious RTI transparency issues in India.

This article explores how these challenges are affecting citizens’ right to know — and what can be done to revive the spirit of the RTI Act.

---

📜 The Vision Behind RTI: Power to the People

The RTI Act was designed to make governance open and answerable. It aimed to:

• Enable citizens to access public records and government decisions.
• Reduce corruption and promote transparency in administration.
• Empower journalists, activists, and common citizens to demand accountability.
• Encourage participatory democracy through informed decision-making.

In its early years, RTI was a revolutionary tool — responsible for exposing multi-crore scams, irregularities in government appointments, misuse of public funds, and even environmental violations.

Yet, the same tool that once empowered India’s democracy is now losing its edge. (RTI Transparency Issues in India)

---

⚠️ Current State: The Growing Transparency Crisis

As India marks 20 years of the RTI Act, several recent reports and RTI disclosures have highlighted alarming gaps in its implementation.

🕐 Long Delays and Case Backlogs

• As of 2025, over 3 lakh appeals and complaints are pending before the Central and State Information Commissions.
• According to the Satark Nagrik Sangathan report, 18 out of 29 commissions face delays of more than one year in resolving cases.
• Some states like Bihar, West Bengal, and Maharashtra have pendency periods of up to three years.

The result? Citizens who file RTIs often receive information too late to matter, defeating the purpose of the law.

🧑‍⚖️ Vacant Posts and Institutional Weakness

Several commissions across India are operating without a Chief Information Commissioner or adequate staff. This weakens enforcement and delays judgments.

The Central Information Commission (CIC) itself has seen extended vacancies, while some state commissions remain non-functional for months.

🧩 Legal Amendments & the DPDP Act’s Impact

The Digital Personal Data Protection (DPDP) Act 2023 has further complicated transparency.
Experts warn it could be misused to deny information under the pretext of “protecting personal data.”

While the government insists the DPDP does not weaken RTI, activists argue that it narrows the definition of public interest, reducing citizens’ access to crucial records — especially in corruption or policy-related cases. (RTI Transparency Issues in India)

---

📰 Case Examples: When Transparency Fails

Recent RTI findings show both the power and fragility of the law:

• An RTI revealed that only 500 families of doctors who died during the COVID-19 pandemic received compensation, out of over 1,600 such cases.
• Another application exposed irregularities in PM CARES Fund allocations, but many questions were rejected as “confidential.”
• Citizens seeking environmental clearances or land acquisition details are increasingly denied under vague “security” clauses.

These examples underline a dangerous trend — information once freely available is now being withheld, often citing “privacy,” “security,” or “public interest” in ambiguous terms. (RTI Transparency Issues in India)

---

🗣️ Expert Opinions: A Call for Reform

Transparency advocates and legal experts have raised red flags about the declining strength of RTI in India.

Anjali Bhardwaj, co-convenor of the National Campaign for People’s Right to Information (NCPRI), recently said:

“RTI was born from a citizen’s movement, not a government gift. Today, that spirit is being diluted through delays, inaction, and misuse of exemptions.”

Former Information Commissioner Shailesh Gandhi adds:

“The RTI Act has not failed — it is being made to fail. Delay in appointments and growing culture of secrecy are symptoms of a deeper governance issue.”

Their concerns echo across civil society, where activists are increasingly targeted or discouraged from filing RTI requests. (RTI Transparency Issues in India)

---

🧭 Government’s Perspective: Balancing Privacy and Transparency

The government defends recent changes, arguing that data protection and transparency must coexist.
Officials claim that the RTI Act is not being weakened but modernized to adapt to the digital era.

The Attorney General of India has stated that the DPDP Act “does not dilute the RTI Act” but ensures responsible data handling in public offices.

However, experts argue that without clear boundaries, “responsible handling” can easily turn into non-disclosure, creating a chilling effect on citizen oversight. (RTI Transparency Issues in India)

---

🔮 Future Impact: What Lies Ahead for Transparency

If current trends continue, India risks turning the RTI Act into a symbolic right, not a practical one.

Possible Future Scenarios

• Erosion of trust: Citizens may stop believing in the RTI process due to long delays.
• Rise in legal challenges: Activists may increasingly approach courts to force disclosure.
• Digital divide issues: Online RTI systems may exclude rural or less literate citizens.
• Increased secrecy in governance: Sensitive decisions may go unchecked by the public.

To prevent this, experts suggest:

• Immediate filling of all commission vacancies.
• Strict timelines for RTI replies and appeals.
• Regular audits of RTI compliance by ministries.
• Stronger protection for RTI users and whistleblowers.

---

🧩 The Way Forward: Reviving the Spirit of RTI

The RTI Act is not just a legal right — it’s a democratic lifeline.
For it to survive another 20 years, India needs to restore institutional independence, reduce bureaucratic resistance, and rebuild citizen trust.

Transparency should not be seen as a threat to governance but as the foundation of good governance. The more the government shares, the stronger democracy becomes. (RTI Transparency Issues in India)